The Evolutionary Dynamics of Modern Relationships: ENM, Boy Sober, and Gendered Strategies
- Ilana Bensimon
- Feb 24
- 6 min read
Updated: Apr 3

Modern dating is often shaped by competing relational strategies between genders. As traditional relationship structures dissolve, new models such as Ethical Non-Monogamy (ENM) and Boy Sober have emerged as adaptive responses to an evolving dating landscape. While these trends are often framed as individual choices, they reflect deeper evolutionary and societal forces that have historically shaped the way men and women approach relationships. Understanding these dynamics can help us navigate modern dating with greater clarity and intentionality.
The Evolutionary Divide in Relationship Strategies
Before diving in this matter, it is important to recognize that evolutionary drives are just one component of human relational needs. While they offer a useful framework for understanding broad patterns in dating and attraction, they do not represent rigid rules for what men and women need. Humans are complex beings shaped by biology, culture, personal experiences, and individual desires.
Rather than viewing evolutionary psychology as a deterministic model, it should be used as a tool for self-reflection—helping explore how these dynamics might influence you while also making room for your personal values, emotional needs, and life aspirations. The key is to integrate this perspective with self-awareness, emotional intelligence, and conscious relationship choices.
Throughout history, men and women have approached relationships with different biological and social incentives.
Men, with a low reproductive cost, have evolved to prioritize access to multiple partners to maximize genetic spread. This often leads to behaviors that seek low-investment, high-reward relationships.
Women, facing a high reproductive cost, have evolved to prioritize security, commitment, and resources to ensure the well-being of offspring. This often translates into a preference for emotionally and financially supportive partners.
These fundamental evolutionary pressures have not disappeared in modern society. Instead, they continue to shape how people engage with relationships, particularly as economic and social freedom expand.
Traditional Marriage
Balancing Gendered Needs at the Cost of Freedom
Historically, marriage served as a compromise between these competing interests:
Men gained consistent sexual access and familial continuity.
Women gained security, resources, and commitment.
Both sacrificed personal freedom to maintain societal stability.
However, with the rise of economic independence, birth control, and shifting social norms, this balance has changed. Today, people are not bound by necessity in relationships, leading to an intensified competition in dating where both genders try to optimize their strategies.
ENM as a Modern Strategy for Men
ENM aligns closely with historical male mating strategies—maximizing access to multiple partners while minimizing relational effort. In today’s dating culture, ENM provides men with:
Greater sexual variety without the constraints of monogamy.
Lowered investment in emotional labor and commitment.
An escape from traditional expectations of provision and exclusivity.
While some engage in ENM for authentic relational exploration, many men adopt it as a means of maintaining access to sex while reducing relational costs. This disproportionately benefits men, as women—who historically value the material and emotional protection of commitment—often struggle to secure long-term investment in an environment that prioritizes casual or non-exclusive relationships.
Boy Sober as a Response to ENM
If ENM allows men to lower their relational investment, Boy Sober represents a counter-strategy for women—removing themselves from a dating market that no longer serves their interests. Many women opt out of dating entirely because:
They are unwilling to compete for emotionally unavailable partners.
They refuse to engage in relationships that do not provide long-term value.
They prioritize self-growth, career development, and autonomy over fleeting connections.
While this can be an empowering move, it also presents risks: withdrawal from relationships does not necessarily build the skills required for long-term relational fulfillment.
The Gendered Struggle for Relationship Fulfillment
What Men Ultimately Want in Relationships:
Emotional and Physical Connection – While men are often driven by a desire for sexual variety, they also crave emotional closeness with a trusted partner.
Respect and Admiration – Men feel fulfilled when they are valued for their strengths, contributions, and ability to provide security (emotionally or materially).
Freedom with Stability – Many men want the balance of a supportive relationship without feeling overly constrained or losing their personal identity.
Low Emotional Conflict – Men tend to prefer relationships that feel easy, supportive, and not emotionally overwhelming.
Purpose and Meaning – A fulfilling relationship should complement a man’s life, not replace his sense of purpose.
What Women Ultimately Want in Relationships:
Security and Emotional Safety – Women tend to seek a deep sense of trust, stability, and consistency in relationships.
Emotional Depth and Intimacy – Women often crave emotional connection and vulnerability in a way that feels reciprocated.
Commitment and Reliability – A fulfilling relationship is one where she knows she can count on her partner.
Excitement with Emotional Stability – Women often look for a mix of romantic intensity and reassuring security.
Being Seen and Valued – Women want to feel deeply appreciated, loved, and prioritized in their relationships.
Where Conflict Arises
Men often prioritize autonomy and admiration, while women often prioritize emotional security and depth.
If men feel controlled, they may withdraw.
If women feel neglected, they may become anxious or disengage.
How to Bridge the Gap
Men benefit from developing emotional intelligence to foster deeper intimacy without feeling suffocated.
Women benefit from embracing autonomy and self-sufficiency to avoid dependence on a partner for material and emotional security.
This dynamic creates relationship dissatisfaction on both sides, as both genders feel unfulfilled—men may struggle to find deep emotional connection, while women may find it difficult to secure meaningful, committed relationships. As these competing strategies clash, modern dating becomes an evolutionary battlefield where:
Men seek low-investment, high-access relationships (ENM, casual dating, hookup culture).
Women respond by either engaging (often reluctantly) or withdrawing entirely (Boy Sober).
The Path to Relationship Fulfillment
Given these realities, the key to relational fulfillment is not just reacting to these trends but understanding and developing the skills necessary to build meaningful connections. This includes:
For Men:
Shift from Quantity to Quality – Instead of focusing on maximizing partners, invest in one or a few deep, meaningful relationships that provide long-term fulfillment.
Develop Emotional Presence – Build emotional intelligence and communication skills to engage more fully in relationships, which leads to more trust and satisfaction.
Embrace Relational Effort – Understand that genuine connection requires investment, vulnerability, and accountability.
Cultivate Purpose Beyond Sex and Status – Men who focus on personal growth, purpose, and meaningful contribution tend to attract and sustain deeper relationships.
What Men Gain by Moving Beyond ENM as a Coping Strategy:
More fulfilling and stable connections based on trust and depth rather than temporary pleasure.
Emotional security and support from a committed partner rather than fragmented relationships.
A stronger sense of identity and purpose beyond fleeting romantic encounters.
For Women:
Move from Avoidance to Skill Development – Instead of withdrawing from relationships entirely, develop relational skills like boundary-setting, communication, and emotional resilience.
Balance Selectiveness with Engagement – It’s possible to be discerning in partner choice without disengaging from dating altogether.
Prioritize Self-Sufficiency, Not Isolation – Build independence while also remaining open to meaningful connection.
Recognize Healthy vs. Unhealthy Dynamics – Learn to distinguish between emotionally unavailable partners and those capable of deep connection.
What Women Gain by Moving Beyond Boy Sober as a Coping Strategy:
The ability to create fulfilling relationships without losing autonomy.
Greater clarity in relational expectations, leading to more aligned partnerships.
Avoidance of prolonged isolation, which can weaken relational skills over time.
Rather than allowing evolutionary impulses to dictate relational strategies, intentionality and self-awareness allow individuals to create the types of relationships that align with their deeper needs. Given these realities, the key to relational fulfillment is not just reacting to these trends but understanding and developing the skills necessary to build meaningful connections. This includes:
Clarity in Relationship Goals – Understanding whether you seek deep commitment, companionship, or autonomy.
Emotional Intelligence & Communication – Learning to navigate connection beyond surface-level attraction.
Mutual Investment & Reciprocity – Ensuring that relationships are built on equal effort, respect, and shared values.
The shifts in modern relationships—ENM, Boy Sober, and the broader dating landscape—are not random trends but expressions of underlying evolutionary and societal forces. Men and women are continually adapting to new dating realities, but true relationship fulfillment does not come from merely reacting to these shifts—it comes from making conscious, skillful, and intentional choices about what kind of relationship one truly wants to build.
While evolutionary psychology provides valuable insights into relational dynamics, it should not be viewed as a rigid determinant of what men and women need. Instead, it serves as one perspective among many that can help individuals reflect on their own desires, relational patterns, and personal growth. Understanding these influences can empower people to make choices that align with both their biological drives and their deeper emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs.
Ultimately, the modern challenge is not whether to engage in ENM, withdraw from dating, or pursue monogamy—it is about understanding one’s relational needs, cultivating the skills to create meaningful bonds, and making empowered choices in an ever-changing romantic landscape.
Comments